Presidential Election 2015

Written by a  female member of the CGC[1]

An article in the Colombo Telegraph provides an interesting account of a seasoned campaigner’s interactions about the forthcoming Presidential elections with Colombo’s businessmen and  what he also calls the ‘Cinnamon Garden Crowd’ especially the women.  He finds that these Colombo society women have not taken the trouble to register themselves as voters and that the businessmen are unabashedly supporting  Mahinda Rajapakse’s re-election.   Over Christmas I too have had an overdose of interactions with a section of the ‘Cinnamon Garden Crowd’ – women and men, doctors, lawyers and professionals  mainly – interactions that were more than slightly annoying on three counts. 

The first is their unconditional support to the Common Candidate Project based mainly on their blind faith in the goodness of Ranil Wickremesinghe (undoubtedly a member of their crowd) and his ability to deliver good governance – a vote for Maithree is a vote for Ranil.  Collective amnesia about  Ranil’s complicity in all the violence of the Premadasa Regime which included the extra judiciary execution of a person of their ilk, Richard de Zoysa, or of  Ranil’s  complete ineffectiveness as a Leader of the Opposition.   Two, their complete disdain for the ‘ordinary voter’ who does not care for democracy,  the rule of law or  for the eradication of corruption and is only concerned about her ‘buth packet’  (their words paraphrased, not mine). Quite a rich criticism coming from individuals whose lack of concern for the cost of their own rice packet is a factor of their affluence, but who have not themselves shown any evidence of advocating for democracy, rule of law or the eradication of corruption.  They are happy not to rock the boat as long as they can carry on business as usual.    And three, (and this is perhaps the most scary) their expectation that if there wasn’t a new President elected, the challenge would at least create a change of heart in the incumbent, who would then proceed to govern this country more democratically.  I have a different scenario playing out in my head.  I think it would be very likely that if the incumbent wins this election and continues in power,  he will, either of his own accord or under pressure from his family (or both), reduce whatever democratic space we still have to ensure that such a challenge will not take place ever again.  I believe there is a strong possibility of military rule.  What worked for the Slave Island evictions, could well be upscaled for the whole island. 

A vote for Maithree is a vote for freedom and democracy, in as much as a vote for Chandrika was a vote for freedom and democracy  two decades ago.  But, as Jeevanie Kariyawasam said in one of her speeches,  we cannot just rely on Maithree and Ranil Wickremesinghe to deliver freedom and democracy.  Complacency and sycophantism need to be eradicated along with corruption.  We must ensure that after Maithree wins the election,  his motley team and he keep their promises. And as citizens, we need to work continuously to hold Maithree and his team accountable.   It is only if we make this effort post elections that we have a chance of getting the governments we, and our children, deserve.   


[1] Cinnamon Garden Crowd

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Some thoughts on the White Saviour Complex of development consultancies

Image
photo taken from  https://e11e99.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/identity-in-a-post-colonial-world/ I am sharing some thoughts that I picked  randomly from a relatively progressive Christian facebook page (Sojourners)that I follow, mainly to help me counter the rather misinformed opinions of my true believer Christian friends (brown not white).  The article is called , 6 HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF THE WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX, BY RYAN KUJA  and is so relevant to the northern development consultancy space that many of my (white) friends and colleagues occupy (and that I too sometimes venture into) that I thought to use it to write a blog post that I can share with that community.   R yan Kuja confesses that he was "never a missionary in the standard sense of the word, never proselytized or attempted to save souls"  but admits that "the engine driving [him] was the white saviour complex..... The other Westerners [he] worked with believed [they] had it all pretty much figur
Read more

Disturbing vignettes (a series) - Sept 26: the brutalising effect of war

Check this out if you haven't already. http://tinyurl.com/kw526a It is a video of the Sri Lankan army executing Tamils early this year and was shown on Channel 4 recently and did the rounds of emails, facebook etc. Naturally it sparked a huge row. GOSL denied it of course. Experts tried to prove it was a fake. Last heard, GOSL was going to sue Channel 4. The footage is udoubtedly quite horrific and irrespective of whether this video is a fake or not, I think it is quite possible that such incidents could have taken place. What I find disturbing is that responsible journalists, and responsible citizens are happy to accept 'evidence' that has so obviously not been triangulated, that is openly admitted to being 'unverified'. Is it not also an indictment of our times that no one is seeing the video as depicting the brutalising effect of war . Armed conflict creates monsters on both sides - and this for me is the most important message that this video needs to bri
Read more

Year 2014: Buddhist era 2557-2558

Image
There was an interesting debate among colleagues that was triggered by the simple fact that I shared the official government calendar for 2014.  The Calendar has, as it has had in the previous year, and possibly many years prior to that,  the sub title -  Buddhist Era 2557-2558. This triggered a discussion on whether it was appropriate to have that on the calendar or not.  The argument against seemed to be based on it being seen as an imposition by the State of Buddhism, into areas that are perceived as secular and non-religious. [Though of course, as was pointed out,  the Gregorian Calendar is not really secular at all, based on the fact that it counts the years from the birth of Christ!] What was interesting was that we were having this debate at all.  Obviously, the current context has made us all ultra sensitive to certain issues, and the whole question of a state religion led some of us to be uncomfortable, others to be resentful (not overtly manifest in this conversation)
Read more